Yesterday’s presentations went well, although it was a long day. There were a lot of interesting ideas and proposals. In the end after finalizing and pulling everything together I was really happy with the way that our proposal went. I felt that not only we showd all of our ideas, but also felt that they would make a difference in the running of the Peacocks stores. Especially now after reading that;

‘the Cardiff-based retailer Peacocks has refused to comment on reports that a number of its stores could close. The low-cost fashion firm has more than 500 stores in the UK and over 100 overseas in 20 countries, including the Bonmarche chain. But the company said it is working on a plan to restructure its business.’

If it were to be put into practice it would certainly restructure there stores, creating a much simpler more unified look to the Peacocks stores as well as by giving the customer a much better experience due to the new layout.

Our Final Proposal was as follows:

What we found wrong?

From first observation of the Peacocks store & website, it was clear that almost every area of their brand and identity was confused, inconsistent or cluttered. The targeted age groups were opposing between the website and the stores, stores themselves were jumbled and in disarray, the brand and its sub brands were confusing and inconsistent.

What approach we took?

The arrangement of clothes and the storage racks in stores, made stock appear cheap and of bad quality. Our decision was that what the stores needed an uplift and more structure. Therefore we’ve put all our work into improving the stores to attract the appropriate age demographic.

What changes have we made?

Before we began our store plans, we refocused a few key areas. Our first approach was to choose one simple colour scheme. We simply took these colours from within the store, the peacocks’ blue found in the logo, a charcoal and gold found on the ‘Peacocks by Design’ tags and a simple grey to add contrast.

The second change we made was to narrow and define the target age group. We’ve decided to aim at you but more sophisticated, fashionable ladies, aged 25 to 40. We chose this age bracket because from our observations most women shopping there already fit into this demographic. Secondly, we wanted to keep Peacocks young but not create another ‘teenage’ environment.

Next we addressed the Pearl Lowe range. We decided to keep the sub-brand available online and instead suggest a smaller smart casual line designed or ‘chosen’ by Pearl Lowe that is accessible within all stores. We believe that it can only benefit their reputation to increase their celebrity endorsement.

Here (directing at screen) we have an over view of our store. We decided that what the store needed most was definitive sections and to create an experience for the customer. (Indicating at coloured sections) We have created a Pearl Lowe section, an every day & office wear section, shoes & accessories, lingerie, and men and children towards the front.

Going through ‘inside’ views

When looking into the store from the outside we have created simple window displays that show off the latest pieces but maintain simplicity & allow the buyer to see into the store. When first walking into the store, the customer sees a platform with mannequins in the middle, and on the furthest wall – a large wall piece. This wall piece is placed so to lure customers towards the end of the store, walking through the different sections to reach it.

Paco Underhill states in his book “Why we Buy” that customers always tend to walk into stores on the side they drive on. Therefore first on the left hand side we have place our ‘Peacocks By Design’ section, which includes the ‘smart casual’ Peacocks line along the back wall. This section stands out from the others, showing that it is the ‘designer pieces’ area.

Separate from the Peacock’s by design section but still next to it, is the ‘smart wear’ section. This is comprised of office and work-wear, and opposite this is the every day section.

If you walk through these two sections you reach the shoes and accessories, we’ve grouped these two together because women often buy matching pieces. The seating area around here also makes it a more relaxed area of the store where women can comfortably sit down, try shoes on and pick out matching pieces.

Beside this is a small lingerie section. Pieces will be kept on shoulder height displays to maintain a privacy when browsing (so you can’t see them from the front of the store) and also so they don’t cover up the wall piece at the back.

We’ve got the dressing rooms up the back so females don’t have to walk around with under garments and the men’s section is to the far right. We’ve kept the mens over here so they aren’t close to the lingerie, and intimidating women. Also they are close to the register, so when women go to purchase something for themselves they will grab something for the husband as well.

The register area is uncluttered and behind the registers is a large mirror that contains the website in the corner. Within our research Paco Underhill suggested that customers are drawn to mirrors and it gives them something to look at while waiting in line. Therefore while looking at the mirror, they also see the website, which creates more awareness about the site and may encourage more to visit it.

Why it will work?

The reason our changes will benefit Peacocks is that it will redefine the ‘Peacocks experience’. Not only will it be more organised and therefore less stressful for the customer but our use of colour schemes, materials and layout will give the customer an enjoyable time shopping because of the atmosphere. It will also aid the Peacocks reputation because clothes will be ordered and have an air of sophistication, which will increase sales.

Focusing on the one age demographic allows the stock in stores to be better suited to that audience (no need to aim at young teenagers). The colour scheme will reinforce the Peacocks identity and in turn will make it stronger.

Connecting the store and the online store will create more consistency and attract the same sought of customer. Although stores won’t sell the exclusive range, they can point customers in the right direction or suggest something from the Peacocks by Design range, or the Pearl Lowe & Peacocks range.

A bit of reflection

Through this module I feel that I have learned a lot and I mean a lot. This is not only just within the tools and techniques used within advertising and branding but also with working in groups, both small and large, and talking in front of them as well as how things would run in the industry. At the start I began to see myself not wanting to try and get into the industry however after discovering the processes that you take and beginning to understand more of how it all works, really makes me want to continue to develop what I have learned, using the tools more within any project I can, and find out more about how the agencies run and deal with clients.

Over the past week my team and myself have been further developing our concepts for the revamp of Peacocks clothing stores. Based on the initial concepts we then created a more detailed sketch of the floor plan showing both the overhead view as well as from the perspective of the shopper. Also we have shown examples of textiles used for the décor along with materials used within the shop floor such as woods, carpets and furnishings.

Bellow are these changes made. Now we are just finishing of our final tweaks for the proposal.

Store Layout

Colour Palette 

Logos and Tags

The reason our changes will benefit Peacocks is that it will redefine the ‘Peacocks experience’. Not only will it be more organised and therefore less stressful for the customer but our use of colour schemes, materials and layout will give the customer an enjoyable time shopping because of the atmosphere. It will also aid the Peacocks reputation because clothes will be ordered and have an air of sophistication, which will increase sales.

Focusing on the one age demographic (fashionable ladies, aged 25 to 40) allows the stock in stores to be better suited to that audience (no need to aim at young teenagers). The colour scheme will reinforce the Peacocks identity and in turn will make it stronger.

Connecting the store and the online store will create more consistency and attract the same sought of customer. Although stores won’t sell the exclusive range, they can point customers in the right direction or suggest something from the Peacocks by Design range, or the Pearl Lowe & Peacocks range.

After meeting yesterday for a tutorial we finalized the key issues that we have discovered in regards to the Peacocks brand. These issues were:

  • Inconsistent throughout store
  • Website inconsistent to stores
  • Same quality as New Look but appears worse
  • Stores aren’t selling their better range (i.e. Pearl Lowe)
  • Mixed messages, mixed audiences
  • Disorganized & Cluttered
  • Various different sub-brands

After some discussion, we then began to tackle some of the problems creating solutions these were ideas such as:

  • Featured more in magazines
  • Shopper magazine with suggestions on clothes
  • Must fulfill the promise > fashion show displaying wrong clothing defeats purpose
  • Pearl Lowe designing other clothes (nice tops or something) that can be sold in stores.
  • Putting Pearl Lowe into Debenhams
  • It has to keep fulfilling the promise > customer experience has to be maintained
  • Have a whole store re-vamp and reflect it in the campaign (window displays, interior walk through, promotional pieces, customer magazine)
  • Don’t bug customers with too much help
  • Ensure there are enough mirrors

We then devised a strategy regarding to the following steps we began to look at today these were things such as to find out if Peacocks has a merchandising manual, to look at department store layout, weather they gave us a good positive experience and finally to go back to New Look and compare experience to that of Peacock for example how customers are treated & feel before looking at creative solutions (how things should be displayed).

With this in mind today was a productive start as we went to fin out first of all wither or not Peacocks had merchandise manuals. We were shocked to find out that they actually did. They call them their trend book or look book. Here the book outlines the fashions over 6 months as well as new floor plans every 2-4 weeks. However they only have one plan to suit ALL stores and frequently the area manager will come in and rearranges the smaller stores.

After creating personas from our interviews regarding people that actually shopped there already, we noticed that there were few younger people that would shop there. We felt this may be the case as a lot of them felt that Peacocks was out of date. This was also brought to light after discovering how rarely they change their range of cloths compared to that of Topshop and Newlook.

With our aim to target a younger audience, however keep the older market. (i.e. don’t make another ‘teenager’ store, keep it sensible & fashionable). We then began to brainstorm what we were going to change. These were things such as:

  • Extend Pearl Lowe brand > smart casual wear (collaborate Peacocks by design & Pearl Lowe) Creating a more accessible range that can be in all stores.
  • Wood barriers or something to separate sections
  • Different shades of tiles to create walk ways between sections
  • Mirrors on walls behind clothes
  • Seats in the changing rooms
  • Seats in shoe section (with low mirrors)
  • Reduce the amount of logos to creating a collaborative one for the Peacocks by design with Pearl Low
  • Create a section for each of the sub brands. Dividing the store similar to that of a department store.

We also decided that we would put a Pearl Lowe range in Debenhams as well as girls on the website should be wearing the clothes. We felt that due to how strongly Peacocks feel about their “boutique stores”, stocking the full range of Pearl Low that we would leave them. However as we felt that she is a big selling point of the brand, by creating some smart casual weir by her or even “picked” by her. This would then make people more likely to go into the store. We propose to do this by creating Peacocks by Design Featuring Pearl Low.

We started creating some ruffs of the interior layout, making different sections within the store for each sub brand. Here we did one each before collaborating them together. While doing this we incorporated some of the styles used to display the Pearl Low range on there website into the design. These were things such as textured wall coverings and added fake windows. Also we felt that by having the website address behind the till would reduce the link between the store and the website especially now as we are going to re-vamp the store. This again would help with the extreme gap Between the Pearl Low range as well as there own.

Finally we felt by making all these changes it would not only keep the existing customer, as they would still know what they were getting in regards to quality and price. Also we felt that the revamp would intrigue them to venture in. this would again persuade them that they still will sell the same things. However by also doing this we fell it will draw in a younger market as they will now see that Peacocks is up to date and following the trends.

We are now going to continue with or visuals these are:

  • Mirror and in store Feature Walls
  • Mannequins and in store Displays
  • Pearl Lowe and Pd Displays,
  • In store Display for Pd & Pearl Lowe
  • Seasonal Window Displays for Regular Peacock (Women’s, Men’s & Kids)
  • Tags, Colour Scheme and In store Magazine

As well as finalizing or overall proposal.

An advert everyone seems to be talking about recently is the Christmas advert for John Lewis. The 90-second video shows Lewis McGowan impatiently waiting for Christmas Day to arrive. But, when the morning finally comes, the little boy ignores his own gifts, rushing instead to give his parents the present he bought for them.

 

A lot of people have been saying how while watching the advert they got that lump in their throat, some people actually crying. I liked the advert and thought it was really well done. I liked the twist at the end and did think it was very sweet, not to the extent of tears mind you. This ad has already been said to be one of the greatest Christmas ads of all time with over 600,00o YouTube hits already. I wanted to find out why the advert was so emotionally touching to a lot of people. Some people say that it is the smiths song however there has been some debate about that in conversation as apparently they were a band against nig corporations. I thought personally that it may have been due to the innocent fact that the boy was more exited to see the reaction on his parents faces with the gift he got them rather than what he himself got. This was until I read an article in the guardian on the advert. Here the righter says:

‘Morrissey’s bitterly ironic sigh of a never-to-be fulfilled desire is transmuted into a topical message of festive hope in recession. Millie sings: “Good times – for a change.” After all we’ve been through, and all we’re going to have to go through, with the eurozone in meltdown, growth figures risible and real wages tumbling, a little relief. Maybe, just maybe, this Christmas could be good’.

More on this article can be found here.

So the ad was is giving us hope? That Christmas will be good. I personally love the holidays and wither Christmas is white or not it has always been more about the lazy day and being with close family I like. So after seeing the advert, having my emotions pulled and thinking how sweet of the child in the ad, do I want to go and shop at John Lewis? Sadly for them no I don’t. This is not just the case with me I have asked several people this. To me the whole point in the ad would be to get people into the shop, especially after they have spent over 5 million on it. It is a memorable advert at least.

Recently I went to visit Peacocks clothing store to get a feel of what the company was about and also how the perceive themselves to the public. In all honesty I was horrified with the store. I already felt that that nothing really connected with the company regarding to the logo and the website, so when I discovered that they had multiple logos for the one line of clothing as well as having more than one logo for peacocks in general I felt that the company as a hole was a jumble sale. Within the store there where some nice features such as photographs of models wearing the outfits, however when you tried to find the dress or shirt that was in the photo I discovered that they did not stock them. After speaking to one of the managers as well we discovered that not all of the stores stocked the Pearl low range. At the time we felt that this was one of peacocks best features as a good few celebrities where this line of clothing.

My group then looked at what the store actually sold. They have five ranges of clothing, these are; Urban Spirit for men, Peacocks by Design, Eve, a child’s range of cloths and the Pearl low collection which you can purchase online and in selected stores. They also sell what can only be known as random trinkets and novelty items such as grow you’re on boyfriend and dog costumes. The last things we noticed about the store were the almost random product placement with some nice items of clothing say for a night out put next to cheaper cloths for casual where. There were clothing stands that where broken, Sales signage through the store was not consistent and varied in design. Finally there was the tiny window display that you could not even see due to the huge sale signs in front of it.

After this visit we all felt we had a better feel and understanding of the companies image. However after this visit the group split in two. One half going out and asking questions such as:

  1. What do you value most in a cloths shop?
  2. What attracts you into a store?
  3. If you had to buy a basic item where would you go?
  4. What do you think of peacocks?
  5. What does Newlook have that Peacocks hasn’t?

The other half of the group including myself went into different stores that competed with Peacocks, including Newlook, which is there main rival. Here we were looking at one item of clothing from each store, this being a woolen jumper, and taking note of the price and quality each one.

In order of good quality the results of this are as follows:

  1. Oasis
  2. River Island
  3. Topshop
  4. Jane Norman
  5. Newlook
  6. Dorothy Perkins
  7. Peacocks
  8. International
  9. Primark

In order of high price the results are as follows:

  1. Oasis
  2. Topshop
  3. River Island
  4. Dorothy Perkins
  5. Jane Norman
  6. Newlook
  7. International
  8. Primark
  9. Peacocks

From this we then developed a perceptual map on the basis of casual wear from this jumper to see where they stand within the market. As they had the lowest price for this item but not the worst quality they did have some gap away from their rivals. However as Peacocks say that they are in direct competition with Newlook I find it strange that they are then cheaper than Primark.

I then came across this article:

Family retailer, Peacocks, has armed itself with another weapon in the fierce fight to gain supremacy in the fast-growing UK discount clothing market.

Peacocks, whose competitors include Matalan and New Look, has cut prices on 70 lines by 10 per cent to further boost sales, creating a festive price war in the lower end of the market.

A spokesman for Peacocks said the company had closely monitored what competitors like Matalan were doing and taken the decision to lower prices further. “Peacocks likes to be the best value in the market,” the spokesman added.

The company looks like it is well on its way to fulfilling its mission to “become the most successful value-for-money clothing retailer in the country, offering great customer service in a friendly, family environment.”

Peacocks recently announced that total sales were up 21 per cent to £106.9m for the 26 weeks to September 30 and profit before tax was also up to 38 per cent to £4.6m. It also announced that it was on track to open 35 to 40 stores in the current year.

After reading this article on Peacocks decision to lower the prices to compete heavier with Newlook and Matalan, I feel that they have then dropped further into the market now competing with Primark in the casual wear range.

As a hole we all felt that initially a lot has to be done in regards to the consistency of the store website and logos. A few ideas so far have been mentioned such as reducing the amount of sub brands, making all the stores the same, actually having the clothing that they show in the photos, revamp the interiors of the store and creating visible window displays to represent the website better. Another plan was to create an almost shopping center look within a store, dividing the different lines of clothing into categories such as casual wear, office wear, kids wear etc. We felt that as there are so many problems in these areas that they should be addressed before any form of campaign is talked.

Now we are going to do a survey of the people that actually shop there to find out why they do. Once we have done this we are then going to plan a further approach to address the issues.

Today my group got together to discus what brief for our exam project. In the end all of us decided that the one we would like to tackle was for Peacocks’ clothing shop. This brief particularly appealed to me due to the fact that nothing links together with the company, from the logo, website and the stores themselves.

Here the brief is: To increase brand awareness of Peacocks and enhance Peacocks’ fashion credentials, without excluding the existing ‘family’ customer. This may involve using above the line marketing channels, such as devising an advertising or digital campaign, sponsorship, or through below the line marketing activity, including PR, window schemes/displays, promotions, in-store point of sale and packaging.

Here they say there target market are women and men between the ages of 18-45, who:

• Are price conscious

• Fashion orientated

• Need clothes to be functional

• Seek value prices and good offers

• Follow trends

• Seek quality

• May have families and are not just buying for themselves

We may want to focus on a specific customer group within the target audience or create a campaign that has broader appeal.

Our initial thoughts were primarily about how different the images of the company are through the different media as well as how they are not taking full advantage of the internal ‘family’ company approach. To give an idea of the difficulty at the moment in trying to see what image Peacocks is trying to give, here is a picture of there website. To me this gives of the impression of the company being quite up market and trendy, not looking at the horrific logo but possibly competing with Topshop.

However when you look at the storefronts you can see that they may be in the same market sector as; Primark, Quiz, Cube, F+F and New look.

I intend to investigate Peacock’s’ competitors and where the sit within the market, as at the moment especially in regards do the quality of there cloths and website I do not see much difference between there cloths and that of say Topshop. Also I am going to investigate with another member of my team what kind of people shop at Peacocks and the moment and get the opinions of a younger audience regarding why they do not shop there. Thinking of what could be done to attract younger people.

Today I had a lecture on international branding based on China. Within the lecture a few Chinese students spoke about not only branding, but also products within china and spoke about the culture and laws. I have to say I was shocked at how different everything is over there. One example given was regarding KFC and how they use clochwiliseation (not entirely sure on the spelling), to change their brand to represent the different culture.

Being fortunate to have lived in countries such as Singapore and South Korea would have thought I would have came across this. Maybe at the time it I may have just not been looking out for it, or possibly down to the fact that Singapore is an extremely westernized country, with the majority of its population actually being ex-pats. I do remember McDonalds and KFC along with a lot of the other department stores there and they were exactly the same as in the UK. I am beginning to think they stayed the same due to the sheer amount of food courts that catered for all divers cultures within the country and that McDonalds may have just purely targeted the amount of western people within Singapore. One thing I do remember most of all ways how easy it was to get the products and services that you needed. There really was something for everyone and to be honest I felt that everything was run far better than in the UK.

On the hole I feel that changing a brand, adapting it to suit another culture would be a tremendous task. It would not entail possibly changing a few products on the menu or services that you offer, but would also mean changing your hole way of thinking.

While looking into the effects of advertising on the effects of teen behavior I was shocked to see that advertisers and marketers are able to use public schools as a venue to promote there products. This is not the case however within Scotland and Wales however in England it is said that the acceptance of advertising, by display of posters, distribution of leaflets or any other direct method, by a school is at the discretion of the head teacher and the board of governors. Even in this case should the desertion be made, what can be advertised is also under the discretion of these people.

So far there have been no hints to wither or not England will follow the Scottish and Welsh executives in banning any form of branding on vending machines. This ban was pushed especially in Scotland to promote healthier eating. Here Scottish schools removed high calorie lunches as well as soft drink in the vending machines, only leaving the diet equivalent. However it still goes on as companies promote sports equipment, books along with other materials through the means of collecting vouchers through the use of their product or service. These are companies such as Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Morison’s as well as walkers who many people believe to be adding to the rate of child obesity in the UK.

Companies want to catch children young to build brand awareness and loyalty, especially as children are rarely as cynical or worldly-wise as adults who have been marketed to all their lives. Companies also count on pester power, when children pressure parents to buy particular brands, and they have their own pocket money to spend.

With preteens from ages 8—10 years old do have the ability to process advertising but do not necessarily do so and adolescents (11—14 years) also having this ability it is said that at this age thinking becomes more multidimensional, involving abstract and concrete thought. Here to me this shows rational and irrational benefits where they are linking brands to their personalities and how they want to be seen. Playing on these factors it is easy to see why marketers and advertisers do what they are doing as it seems to be a full proof way for them to make prophet. Looking back at a recent lecture where we were looking at advertisements and saying if they had or had not been banned. The majority of them that where banned seemed to be due to reasons for the fact that children may see them. So why is little being done in England to stop Advertising in schools if adolescents are so susceptible to them?

In America however, there is very little and sometimes no regulation to ad’s in schools. Here not only do some schools have Pizza Hut’s and Subways in the cafeterias, but also have advertisements playing on TV’s within not only the lunch halls but also in classrooms and corridors. Sponsorship for the sports facilities are also aloud, here Logos are displayed on team equipment as well as scoreboards and banners in the gyms.

I thought out of all the countries that would have advertising in schools, gaining extra funding would be Scotland, as this would be an extra means of funding with budgets and expenses being so heavily cut. I do find it hard to believe that with all the regulations advertising is still aloud in schools. Especially with everything that is said regarding how susceptible adolescents are to them. Schools being the place where children and teens spend most of there time, to me advertising and marketing shouldn’t be in schools at all.

Bibliography

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2004) Children, Adolescents, and Advertising: Teens Encounter Advertising from a Variety of Sources. Published in Washington, DC. Vol. 118. Page 2563—2566.

Mary Story, Simone French. (2006). International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity: Advertisers View Teens as Marketing Opportunities. Published in London. Page 19.

Su Clark. (2004). Advertising in schools. Published in TES Newspaper London.

In a lecture today we were discussing the regulations within advertising. Things such as reckless behavior to promote a product or service. For example someone driving recklessly in a TV ad would be banned. This reminded me of a competition by VW ‘The Fun Theory’, and the winner of this competition. The winning submission is called the speed camera lottery. This in tales having a sign in the middle of the road that tells you what speed you are going. Unsuspecting drivers however will not realize there is a camera on this board as well. The people that go past and are not abiding by the speed limit will have a photo taken of them and fined. However if you drive past it within the speed limit you will also have a photo taken, although this time you will be entered into a lottery where the money that the people who where find is the prize.

I personally think it’s a great idea. Although this does not relate at all about what the discussion was, the general idea of this and by having fun creating a positive impact on people I found thought provoking. Could something like this be done within advertising? Something that takes your image in some way instantly entering you into a competition? Although here I feel you would have to tell the public what you were doing, as it would more than likely be banned.

In a group we looked back at what we did during our recent 24 hour brief. Firstly we thought of the ideas that we did not finally develop. These where ones however that we both felt could progress into a campaign. The ideas that we thought of where:

  • Be his hero, here the woman would be portrayed as his hero by getting him to go to the GP.
  • Guilt tripping the mother, showing a daughter who would say to her that someone’s father had died in school.
  • He looks after his car so why not himself.

After brain storming each of these we decided that the one that we felt could be further developed was ‘He looks after his car so why not himself?’ During the initial brief this idea got ruled out as people felt that it was to targeted towards males and not females, so this is what we thought about first of all.

First of all we thought that we were not going to use an initial strap line to draw people attention in as we thought that if we put the campaign in places where they could be read such as busses, trains and even the doctors they would be inclined to read the poster.  Buy doing this we could then have phrases such as ‘ he takes care of his gadgets but why not himself. He needs you to keep him on the right path. Here the campaign would show a man standing inform of two roads, one leading to a car repair shop, the other to the GP. Here a woman would be pointing to the GP.

However we felt that this again would not really be targeted at woman although there would be a woman leading the way to the doctors. We then began to think of ways to maybe make the woman feel guilty and try to pull on an emotion. While thinking of this we thought we could use ‘ checking your car again before that weekend away? Could be time wasted as he never got that lump checked’

Here we did not see this going anywhere as there where not any other scenarios that we could add to the campaign, although we did feel that the general concept could be taken further. This is how we came to our final outcome. Again we were trying to make the woman out to be the ‘bad guy’ and where trying to make them feel guilty as if they could have done this at some point. This being ‘remember nagging him to fix that annoying flicker on the light? Seams like time wasted when you should have been nagging him to get that lump checked.’ We felt that this would directly relate to a woman as these scenarios seamed something that a wife or partner would say. Here as well we thought that by using images that showed the man looking fit and healthy may put the point across that he may seem that way yet could have an underlying problem.

These are the three posters that we developed from this. We also felt that there was room to develop this further into television ads as these scenarios could be acted out and even showing the consequences of not going to the doctor, such as death, playing on the shock factor. Fe felt it was quicker and more elective to do these roughs digitally, as well as being able to get a better feel for the campaign.